pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 33%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 100%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 25%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 20%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 50%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 20%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 14%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 20%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 25%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 20%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 5%
It literally doesn't matter because this isn't a discussion of the death penalty. This is an individual asking about a serious situation at work you deliberately ran off the rails to push a political agenda. Take your anti-justice garbage and shut it.
Oh, and by the way, OP's friend being expected to work alongside their rapist functionally is worth than death.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 9%
It is to you because that is how you framed it. Re-read what you wrote. You and your cult have offered nothing but logical fallacies, especially Motte and Baileys, strawmen, transparent threats, and talking points for an anti-justice, anti-victim, anti-woman political agenda. And you do it because you don't care about rape victims or their lives, and you don't care about OP, you're here on your hustle looking to push an agenda.
And I am telling you NO. Get the fuck on. Get off our lawn.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 15%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 25%
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 6%
Yes, they should be able to feed and house themselves, which they can't do if they're being forced to work around a rapist.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 9%
Yes the fuck you are, you vile, disgusting rape apologist. You and your ilk have:
- Told us that rape is more recoverable than murder, therefore it's not as bad
- Insisted society has an obligation to feed people and therefore a known sexual predator has rights that supercede the rights of his victims or potential victims that would be violated if the company fired them to protect the rest of the workplace
- That a company would have no liability to protect its women workers and that, in fact, the woman would create a hostile work environment for the rapist by complaining about it
- That women should just shut up and get over it, and suffer the presence of a rapist.
These are positions your little cult have argued, hiding behind flowery language and Motte-and-bailey arguments, and you will NOT escape responsibility for your words.
You are a rape apologist. Period.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 11%
You're not listening. Companies shouldn't hire either. And we're talking specifically about rapists, not thieves. Don't waste my time trying to strawman.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 13%
Yes, you ARE the troglodyte BECAUSE you don't want to protect other people by imprisoning rapists for life, serious and extreme criminals who need to be kept away from society permanently.
You are a backwards-ass sexist who belongs in the 20th century. You'd get along well with Brett Kavanaugh, Bill Cosby and all of their ilk.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 16%
Don't let the door hit you where the good lord split you.
pinkdrunkenelephants 8mo ago • 4%
Well, when did anyone say they were ostracizing a rapist? You want to talk about logical fallacies, you best look at yourself and your compatriots here.
Firing them from a job like that, where they have to work closely with women and have the opportunity to reoffend, isn't ostracization the way you're flagrantly exaggerating it to be. It's called common sense.
The other employees have every right to fear being raped because there is a known sexual predator in the workplace. It's a specific and credible fear that not only is grossly immoral if the company doesn't act, it also will put them in a position of extreme liability. That scumfuck should never have gotten past the background check in the first place.
And you don't care about that because all you care about is yourself. Because like the other apologists here, you're thinking from a perspective of "But what if I get caught?" and that means you believe you or someone you know will rape someone someday -- and you'll keep them in your life anyway, because you don't care about justice or morality, you only care about shielding your friends from consequences.
One thing we definitely need to talk shop about are potato chips and french fries. The prices for these have definitely gone up the past few years -- where I live, it's $4.79 for a bag of Lay's, and $2.49 for the individual sized ones. 😨 That is *absolutely fucking batshit.* And chips and fries are much safer and healthier to eat if you make them at home anyway. What I do is I slice up either a sweet potato or a Russet if that's all I have, soak it in some water for a little bit, pour 2-3 cups of avocado oil into a pan, heat it up and fry the chips or fries. Let them dry on a paper towel. Cover with 11 herbs and spices. Question mark, profit. This is infinitely cheaper if you use canola oil, but I use the avocado oil for health. It's one of the few expensive food items I buy anymore. ----------- They Did The Math: Anyway, prices. Using Walmart Great Value brand for this as Walmart is ubiquitous: Sweet potato: $0.98/each, Russet potato: $0.83/each, $3.97/5 lb bag Canola oil: $4.24/48 fl oz, $10.24/gallon There are about 16 cups in a gallon, so that's $0.64 a cup if you bulk buy the big hulking jug. So about $1.92 for 3 cups, plus the price of the potato comes to about: Sweet potato fries: $2.90/potato Russet potato fries: $2.75/potato Compared to the price of a large fry at major fast food joints: McDonald's: $4.79 Burger King: $3.39 Hardee's/Carl's Jr: $3.59 Wendy's: $3.39 ------------ Conclusion: It seems awfully silly to not just make fries for yourself at home if you're able to. Or if you're going to eat out, go to a sit-down diner where you can at least get better quality food. But, for the purposes of this sub, it's pretty clear just making your own fries and chips and such is much easier on your wallet and likely your waistline, too, depending on what oil you use. ------------- Some recipes I found: https://www.thespruceeats.com/how-to-make-homemade-potato-chips-2217401 https://thecozycook.com/homemade-french-fries/ https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/homemade-french-fries/ https://www.allrecipes.com/recipe/73135/homestyle-potato-chips/
www.theguardian.com
🤔 Homebrew snack recipes are things we need to round up and post. Especially potato chips. Those things are infinitely cheaper and healthier to just make on your own than to buy at the store.
www.ksl.com
"Even though we're pushing through pricing, the consumer is tolerating it well," he said in October analyst call. normal way to talk about 'fellow' human beings
I'm partial to meatless chili and/or goulash myself. Share yours :D
www.tasteofhome.com
I make a chili mac dish like this all the time and it is one of the best money-saving recipes you can get anywhere. It's literally just beans, noodles and tomatoes, and it's damn good.
www.erininthemorning.com
cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news@lemmy.world/t/794058 > In audio released Friday evening, senators and representatives from Ohio and Michigan revealed the "endgame" is to ban transgender care "for everyone."
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10963396 > Nearly all the copies of a small-town Colorado newspaper were stolen from newspaper racks on the same day the Ouray County Plaindealer published a story about charges being filed over rapes alleged to have occurred at an underage drinking party at the police chief’s house while the chief was asleep, the owner and publisher said Friday. > > Mike Wiggins vowed to get to the bottom of it, posting Thursday on X, formerly Twitter: “If you hoped to silence or intimidate us, you failed miserably. We’ll find out who did this. And another press run is imminent.” > > The newspaper posted the story on social media and [removed its website paywall](https://www.ouraynews.com/2024/01/17/girl-rapes-occurred-chiefs-house/) so people could read about the felony sexual assault charges filed against three men, including a relative of the police chief, for actions that allegedly occurred at a May 2023 party in Ouray where drugs and alcohol were used, according to court records. The suspects were ages 17, 18 and 19 at the time, and the person who reported the rapes was 17, records said.