Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 50%
Marriage is about my happiness and according to AITA and TwoXChromosome my husband is a toxic spouse and I need to leave him, force my kids into poverty and go out there and just be happy without those lead balloons. Marriage over do it now
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 100%
So would they
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 66%
Good news is they have to buy it
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 100%
Name on the reservation?
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 100%
Yea but like have fun with it
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 92%
Blow their mind and counter protest by praying for them and show up wearing priest outfits and have your own Jesus. Make it a whole thing that your godlier
Touching_Grass 9mo ago • 100%
Why are they shooting at unarmed grandmothers holding hands with a child?
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 50%
Sudo Cowabunga dudes.zip
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 100%
Now that I'm thinking about itHave any cave divers / spelunker's ever found treasure?
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 100%
I've already said I'm not going to hit anyone. And those are already crimes
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 100%
Public education
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 25%
In the context of what people have said here they are the same.
Luck has nothing to do with victimless crime. I can safely navigate running red lights and be as safe as smoking weed.
Increases stoners increases amount of stoned drivers on the road. Increasing risk to all drivers.
Smoking anything increases risk of disease. Inhaling any burning substance increases risk both to mental and physical health. Increasing demand on medical systems already stretched thin. Who says a pot head doesn't kick someone out of prompt medical care by taking up a bed or service.
But again increasing risk doesn't create any victims. We've said no victimless crime should exist. Unless they should exist and that risk to public is a viable reason to create a law.
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 14%
Yet there is no victim. You're not a victim because the risk is higher.
Because then the argument changes to that there are victimless crimes that are reasonable to have and that on that scale everything from running red lights to drug use would be on it
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 40%
Driving through red lights doesn't affect anyone either than. I make it through the intersection, nobody gets hurt and everybody gets what they want. We're arguing same thing. Both are victimless crimes.
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 100%
I think its still possible that I could freely choose my actions and you knowing what they would be would not invalidate that it was an action I choose based on my own free will.
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 33%
Weed isn't benign. It exasperates amd can induce psychotic mental health conditions much earlier in some people like schizophrenia and bipolar. It is carcinogenic. It does change people mentally affecting their emotional regulation and behaviors even when not high. There are impacts on already stretched health care systems. And what is wrong with wanting to argue. I want someone to give me good reason to think what constitutes a victimless crime isn't some arbitrary line
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 22%
There is always risk. Having easily accessible weed increases the risk that people will operate vehicles while high or increase number of beds needed in medical systems that refuse to increase beds as inhaling smoke increases cancer risk. I can drive through 100 red lights and never hit anyone but an increased demand for medical care in a system that can't handle it puts me at risk also. I say running a red light is victimless just as smoking weed is also victimless and we have said victimless crimes should not be punishable.
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 18%
Intent?
I haven't attempted to kill anyone running a red light. So where is the harm
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 7%
So its a crime to increase risk to society?
There isn't a victim. Just the possible increased risk.
Touching_Grass 10mo ago • 28%
That’s pretty funny, does that include your political enemies?
Can honestly say I've never had a political enemy
Last I heard she was visited by Chinese officials and then radio silence. Is there any updates
The documents show provincial agency Ontario Health contracted Don Mills Surgical Unit Ltd. at the following per-surgery funding rates in each of the three fiscal years starting from 2020-21: • $1,264 for each procedure classed as minor complexity (such as cataract surgery) • $4,037 for each moderate complexity surgery (such as a laparoscopic gallbladder removal) • $5,408 for each higher-complexity surgery (such as repairing a large tear of a rotator cuff). The funding rates do not include how much the surgeon bills OHIP for each operation. The physician's billing for a particular OHIP-covered surgery is identical whether it takes place in a hospital or a private clinic. ---
What exactly is accomplished when corporate culture sits everybody down and has a power point about the strategy, business goals for the next year. Stuff like saying "our new plan is focusing on areas like key player, resilience and fast resource adaption to better serve customers". Stuff that seems super abstract and boil down to "worker faster or harder" or saying that whats important to the company are "customers, excellent products and people who make products" but said over an hour and mixed in with corporate jargon It seems like a ton of work goes into these things but its all not usable information. So what is it that these scrum master project managers and higher executives hope to achieve at the end of these calls?
I would like to start using RSS feeds but every client I've searched up has a subscription method of payment. Are there any RSS clients that don't do this?
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a1b30184-e084-400c-9b97-efc965e2dc02.jpeg)
I see a lot of companies with fresh faced 25 year olds that are running all kinds of AI stuff. Everything from NPT, Vision, organization tools. What I don't get is how they're doing this with such small teams. How are these young companies building out AI services?
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/9159186 > Various nuggets of interest in this survey of Gen Z and millennials