I mean it was understandable— everyone praises the five good emperors for choosing successors but none of them actually had biological kids, and there was no precedent that the successor would be chosen. Realistically, Aurelius wanted to avoid a civil war and wasn't like entirely throwing, I think I saw like a story about how he like. Didn't want to do it but it was like the only good outcome or optimal at least

No, I think the phrasing means 7, 8, or 9 even though technically neither 7 or 9 are between 7 and 9, it's like figurative

I assume it's because it's like "de" or something i.e. Deutschland

The implication is that when closed you can use them one handed

I mean JSO never actually tried to damage historical pieces. The paintings are behind glass

Ukraine is not doing genocide

I have the Palma. I use it mostly just to read, and I prefer it to when I had a kindle purely for portability.

Me on Micro

Photon and Thunder

But that doesn't happen?

The US isn't a good democracy, and unfortunately our system is not only unfair but makes third party votes very stupid

But there's no way to make his comments not make sense here— he talks about insane asylums, then brings up an iconic fictional insane person

I mean I don't like Trump at all but he's very obviously kidding every time he does the Hannibal Lector reference (he makes this one pun over and over about "having you for dinner," laughs, uses a sarcastic tone, and notes how the media gets upset) and he was pretty clearly kidding with the baseball comment too.

Still in development but Lighttube seems interesting and uses its own backend.

I'd disagree because as an American the US government has a lot more impact on me than the Chinese

That's not what doxxing is. Doxxing is revealing someone's information in a way that identifies them and puts them at risk of being harmed.

We don't know anything identifying from the comment you're accusing.

How is that doxxing?

This is not how anyone actually uses the word, though.

...still more than Trump would, no?

...so maybe vote for the guy who can be controlled by protests, and not the guy who wouldn't care about not-his-base protesting?